<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Vquence - Video Technology and Metrics Experts &#187; nike</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.vquence.com.au/tag/nike/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.vquence.com.au</link>
	<description>Social Video Intelligence</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 25 Apr 2010 08:32:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Dark viral videos and Witchery</title>
		<link>http://www.vquence.com.au/2009/02/15/dark-viral-videos-and-witchery/</link>
		<comments>http://www.vquence.com.au/2009/02/15/dark-viral-videos-and-witchery/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 16:50:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>silvia</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Campaign]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[naked]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nike]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[singularity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[viral]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[witchery]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wikipedia defines viral marketing as &#8220;marketing techniques that use pre-existing social networks to produce increases in brand awareness or to achieve other marketing objectives through self-replicating viral processes, analogous to the spread of pathological or computer viruses.&#8221;
Some recent marketing campaigns have taken their &#8220;viral&#8221; aspect to its extreme and are not even mentioning a product [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wikipedia defines viral marketing as &#8220;marketing techniques that use pre-existing social networks to produce increases in brand awareness or to achieve other marketing objectives through self-replicating viral processes, analogous to the spread of pathological or computer viruses<a class="mw-redirect" title="Computer viruses" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computer_viruses"></a>.&#8221;</p>
<p>Some recent marketing campaigns have taken their &#8220;viral&#8221; aspect to its extreme and are not even mentioning a product or brand name, but are instead running a <a title="Wired's definition of dark marketing" href="http://www.wired.com/culture/culturereviews/magazine/16-07/st_jw">dark</a> campaign. The only aim this can have is to encourage the curiousity of the audience that finds something oddly unreal about the video and starts investigating who could be behind it. Such an approach usually engages younger audiences who dislike overt marketing and gets people talking &#8211; ultimately also talking about the brand.</p>
<p>Let me explain what I mean by &#8220;dark viral marketing&#8221; with three recent examples, one of which is Australian.</p>
<p><strong>1. Taylor Momsen escapes paparazzi </strong></p>
<div>
<object width="480" height="295"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/8kHdNkAPBdw&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/8kHdNkAPBdw&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="295"></embed></object></div>
<div></div>
<div>A overly energetic Taylor Momsen runs away from the photographers &#8211; something that was immediately assumed by bloggers (e.g. <a title="nike viral campaign" href="http://www.inquisitr.com/15344/taylor-momsen-nike-viral-campaign/">here</a>, <a title="Taylor Momsen Nike" href="http://justjared.buzznet.com/2009/01/12/taylor-momsen-is-a-monkey/">here</a> or <a title="Taylor Momsen Nike" href="http://www.shoewawa.com/2009/01/is_gossip_girls.html">here</a>) to be an ad. Turns out, it is an ad for Nike. It achieved more than 580,000 views, hundreds of comments, and created <a title="Nielsen Buzz on Taylor Momsen Nike ad" href="http://www.blogpulse.com/search?query=Taylor+Momsen+Nike&amp;image22.x=27&amp;image22.y=15">quite a buzz around the blogosphere</a>.</div>
<div></div>
<div>
<div><strong>2. Leaked assassination footage from Russia</strong></div>
<div></div>
<div><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/6FGsvOzB1Hk&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/6FGsvOzB1Hk&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></div>
<div></div>
<div>This one is a challenge to uncover &#8211; it took <a title="russian assassination" href="http://dosdotzero.com/?p=210">one blogger&#8217;s intensive detective work</a> to find out that this is really a dark viral ad &#8211; in fact, the video is part of the storyboard &#8211; for the new first-person shooter game Singularity. Feedcompany bascially admitted <a title="russian assassination" href="http://feedcompany.com/2009/02/activisions-viral-campaign-for-singularity-starts-with-a-bang/">in their blog</a> that they helped DDB roll this out. I guess this was a great test to challenge the prospective purchaser of Singularity. With more than 600,000 views within only 2 weeks and more than 2,000 (!) comments, this has certainly hit a nerve.</div>
<div><strong> </strong></div>
<p><strong>3.  Are you my man in the jacket?</strong></div>
<div></div>
<div>
<div><object width="480" height="295"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/zQybOsM-7Qw&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/zQybOsM-7Qw&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="295"></embed></object></div>
</div>
<div></div>
<div>In this Australian video, a girl asks to be put back in contact with a guy she met in a cafe who left his jacket behind. The video <a title="witchery ad" href="http://mumbrella.com.au/2009/01/20/naked-accused-of-screwing-the-industry-over-girl-with-the-jacket-fake/">was</a> <a title="SMH on Witchery ad" href="http://www.smh.com.au/news/home/technology/sydney-cinderellas-jacket-man-exposed/2009/01/20/1232213599896.html">exposed</a> as a dark viral ad for <a title="witchery" href="http://www.witchery.com.au/">Witchery</a>&#8217;s new menswear line and run by <a title="Naked" href="http://www.nakedcomms.com/">Naked Communications</a>.</div>
<div></div>
<div>For an Australia-only campaign, the video received an amazing number of views &#8211; more than 190,000 within the first month and more than 1,000 comments! It made it <a title="Witchery channel 9" href="http://news.ninemsn.com.au/national/720153/womans-crusade-to-find-cafe-romeo-a-fake">into</a> <a title="SMH Witchery ad" href="http://www.smh.com.au/news/lifeandstyle/lifematters/a-lost-jacket-and-a-stolen-heart/2009/01/17/1231609053191.html">main</a>-<a title="SMH witchery ad" href="http://www.smh.com.au/news/home/technology/sydney-cinderellas-jacket-man-exposed/2009/01/20/1232213599896.html">stream</a> <a title="witchery article" href="http://www.news.com.au/dailytelegraph/story/0,22049,24926285-5001021,00.html">media</a> and got <a title="blog on witchery" href="http://mullygrub.wordpress.com/2009/01/19/its-a-cheap-marketing-ploy-yet-im-still-here/">lots</a> of <a title="blog on witchery ad" href="http://www.bannerblog.com.au/news/2009/01/man_in_the_jacket_hoax_viral.php">other</a> <a title="witchery marketingmag" href="http://www.marketingmag.com.au/blogs/view/1008/">attention</a> (<a title="witchery ad" href="http://amnesiablog.wordpress.com/2009/01/29/fake-virals-social-objects-and-naked/">here</a> and <a title="witchery hoax" href="http://mumbrella.com.au/2009/02/06/naked-publishes-names-of-the-journalists-it-hoaxed/">here</a>).</div>
<div></div>
<div>Interestingly, a follow-up video where <a title="Heidi comes clean" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lciYV9Fks-o&amp;feature=channel">Heidi &#8220;comes clean&#8221;</a> also shows all signs of a viral video with more than 40,000 views after only three weeks. Below is the graph as recorded by Vquence, which shows how viral the first view days of this second video were.</div>
<div></div>
<div><img title="Witchery Followup Ad Views" src="/images/stories/witchery_followup.png" border="0" alt="Witchery Followup Views" /></div>
<div></div>
<div>This agrees with an analysis published by <a title="hitwise on witchery" href="http://weblogs.hitwise.com/to-go-ap/2009/02/witching_and_hoping_for_a_audi.html">Hitwise</a> which states that the Witchery website increased its market share within the Apparel and Accessories industry by 120% and ranked the second most popular downstream to receive traffic from YouTube in the same industry. Survey company <a title="edentify" href="http://edentify.com.au/">edentify</a> also <a title="edentify report on witchery" href="http://mumbrella.com.au/2009/01/29/naked-the-numbers-prove-we-were-right-to-do-the-witchery-jacket-hoax/">reported huge successes</a> for the Witchery brand recognition and perception. In contrast, social media monitoring service <a title="Streamwall witchery report" href="http://mumbrella.com.au/2009/02/05/exclusive-despite-nakeds-survey-their-witchery-campaign-was-a-social-media-failure/">Streamwall reports </a>only little viral effect and a dominantly (by 23%) negative social discussion.</div>
<div></div>
<div>It seems while the industry was outraged about this dishonest ad and authored much of the negative publications around it, consumers were amused and entertained for a while, but mostly indifferent about it. The publicity certainly helped increase the brand knowledge.</div>
<div></div>
<div></div>
<div>The more fundamental question about these kind of ads is: should you produce a video ad and not mention what it is actually trying to sell? It seems not disclosig the brand can stir more interest from the public and more airtime by main-stream media. On the other hand you take the risk that the audience does not follow up and discover the brand at all. I think we&#8217;re going to see many more of these videos.</div>
<div></div>
<div>The largest problem with such ads is that they are not per se creating customer engagement, but just customer entertainment. It will be difficult to include them into a strategy that keeps people engaged with the brand. It will work well to enter a young market with a bang.</div>
<div></div>
<p><span id="more-40"></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.vquence.com.au/2009/02/15/dark-viral-videos-and-witchery/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
